banner1 home banner2
Welcome! (Log In)
Animal Search


     



Linear Type Evaluations
gradient line

The linear type trait genetic evaluations incorporate a multi-trait analysis. Multiple trait analysis increases the accuracy of the evaluations by considering the genetic correlations of the given linear trait with all other linear traits.
Genetic evaluations for linear type traits are reported by Holstein Association USA as Standard Transmitting Abilities, or STAs. STAs rank an animal based on its genetic merit relative to the average cow born in 2010 in standard units. Since the bulls being actively marketed by AI organizations have been heavily selected for production and type traits, the AI bull population has a higher STA average for most linear traits compared to cows born in 2010.

Linear type traits can help you breed a more profitable herd of Holsteins through selecting better bulls. Understanding linear type trait STAs can help you:

1. identify the most important traits
2. set realistic genetic goals for each trait
3. select a better group of mating sires
4. mate each cow to a complimentary bull
5. accumulate genetic gains across generations

Table 2 shows the average STAs of bulls coded ACTIVE or LIMITED. Classified cows born in 2010 represent the genetic base for these averages.

striped line divider
Table 2.
Average STA of Available Bull Population - December 2018 Based on Animal Model Genetic Evaluations
striped line divider
Trait
Average STA
Direction   Trait
Average STA
Direction
Stature 1.17 Tall Fore Udder Attachment 2.13 Strong
Strength 0.59 Strong Rear Udder Height 2.71 High
Body Depth 0.49 Deep Rear Udder Width 2.49 Wide
Dairy Form 1.09 Open Udder Cleft 1.02 Strong
Rump Angle 0.08 Sloped Udder Depth 1.62 Shallow
Rump Width 0.81 Wide Front Teat Placement 0.92 Close
Rear Legs - Side View 0.24 Curved Rear Teat Placement 0.88 Close
Rear Legs - Rear View 1.06 Straight Teat Length 0.42 Short
Foot Angle 1.14 Steep Udder Composite 1.86 High
Feet & Legs Score 1.21 High Feet & Legs Composite 1.04 High


HERITABILITY OF TYPE TRAITS

The degree to which a bull or cow is able to genetically influence various characteristics in its offspring is measured by heritability. Faster genetic progress can be achieved for traits which are higher in heritability compared to traits which are lower in heritability. It is difficult to make much genetic progress through selection and mating unless a trait has a heritability of .10 or higher.

Table 3 contains estimates of heritability for linear traits currently summarized by the Holstein Association, USA.


Table 3. Heritabilities of Holstein Association USA type traits.
HERITABILITIES
Trait h2   Trait h2   Trait h2
Stature .42   Rear Legs - Rear View .11   Udder Depth .28
Strength .31   Foot Angle .15   Front Teat Placement .26
Body Depth .37   Feet & Legs Score .17   Rear Teat Placement .32
Dairy Form .29   Fore Attachment .29   Teat Length .26
Rump Angle .33   Rear Udder Height .28   Final Score .29
Rump Width .26   Rear Udder Width .23      
Rear Legs - Side View .21   Udder Cleft .24      

As Table 3 shows, the linear type traits differ substantially in heritability. For example, udder depth has a significantly higher heritability than foot angle. As a result, for a given level of selection, we can expect a greater response in a mating involving udder depth as compared to foot angle. Both the heritability of the trait and the relative economic relationship of the trait to overall profitability should be taken into consideration when determining which traits to incorporate into a breeding program.


LINEAR COMPOSITE INDEXES


Holstein Association USA Linear Composite Indexes combine linear trait information on several related traits into one numerical value. Composite indexes can be used as a selection tool in breeding programs to identify those bulls which are predicted to transmit a desirable combination of the traits in the Composite Index. The traits included in each Composite Index are:

  UDDER COMPOSITE INDEX
    Udder Depth   Front Teat Placement
    Fore Udder Attachment   Rear Teat Placement
    Udder Cleft   Teat Length
 
  Rear Udder Height
  Stature
 
  Rear Udder Width
  DAIRY CAPACITY COMPOSITE INDEX
 
  Dairy Form
 
  Strength
  FEET & LEGS COMPOSITE INDEX
 
  Foot Angle
  Feet & Legs Score
 
  Rear Legs - Rear View
  Stature
  BODY WEIGHT COMPOSITE INDEX
 
  Stature
  Rump Width
    Body Depth  Dairy Form
 
  Strength
     

Udder Composite and Feet & Legs Composite were developed to increase individual lactation averages, productive life, and lifetime production of fat and protein. A negative weight on stature results in the decoupling of the composites from stature, allowing breeders to improve udders and feet & legs without making their cows taller.

Udder Composite Index


Udder Composite describes a well formed capacious udder with strong attachment. Using bulls with a high UDC results in a lowering of the somatic cell score and daughters whose udders are trouble-free and capable of holding more milk.

 

The UDC formula is as follows:

UDC = -0.03 + [(.16 x FU) + (.23 x UH) + (.19 x UW) + (.08 x UC) + (.20 x UD) +
(.04 x TP) + (.05 x RP*) + (.05 x TL*) - (.2 x ST)] x 1.16

RP* and TL* have an intermediate optimum. There is a penalty for rear teats that are placed too close to one another. The same goes for teat length. Teats that too long or too short are penalized.
The values -0.03 and 1.16 are used to standardize the composite with the 2010 Base Population of cows.

Where:
FU = Fore Udder Attachment
UC = Udder Cleft
RP* = Rear Teat Placement
UH = Rear Udder Height
UD = Udder Depth
TL** = Teat Length
UW = Rear Udder Width
TP = Front Teat Placement
ST = Stature

* If Rear Teat Position is less than or equal to 1, then RP* = RP.
If Rear Teat Position is greater 1, then RP* = 1-(RP x 0.1).

**TL* = (-1 x ABS(TL)) - (ABS(TL) x ABS(TL) x 0.1) where ABS(TL) is the absolute value of Teat Length

The desirability curves for Rear Teat Placement and Teat Length are shown below:



Feet & Legs Composite Index


The Feet & Legs Composite formula utilizes a combination of the major category Feet & Legs Score along with three linear traits. The FLC formula is as follows:

FLC = +0.02 + [(.09 x FA) + (.21 x RV) + (.70 x FLS) - (.20 x ST)] x 1.09

The values +0.02 and 1.09 are used to standardize the composite with the 2010 Base Population of cows.

Where:
FA = Foot Angle     RV = Rear Legs Rear View     FLS = Feet & Legs Score     ST = Stature

Feet and legs are a primary concern for dairy producers worldwide. Selecting animals that transmit superior mobility, steeper foot angle, wider rear leg stance with little or no hock-in and slightly straight rear legs (side view) will result in animals capable of longer productive lives. The Feet and Legs Composite was designed to maximize within-herd lifetime production of combined Fat and Protein.


Body Weight Composite Index


The Body Weight Composite includes a measure of both body size, i.e., the dimensions of the cow, and dairy form. By including dairy form, we take into consideration how hard the cow is milking, accounting for an excess or lack of body fat. The BWC formula is as follows:

BWC = (.23 x Stature) + (.72 x Strength) + (.08 x Body Depth) + (.17 X Rump Width) - (.47 x Dairy Form)

Every 1.0 STA increase in body size correlates with a 40 pound predicted increase in mature body weight. For example, daughters of bulls that sire large cows (large positive evaluations for body size, +3.00) are predicted to weigh 240 pounds more than those that sire small cows (large negative evaluations for body size, -3.00.)


OTHER COMPOSITE INDEXES

Feed Efficiency

Feed Efficiency is the net profit a farmer receives from an increase in production. Feed Efficiency is calculated from the following information:

(Dollar Value of milk produced) - (Feed costs of extra milk) - (Extra maintenance costs)

Dollar Value of milk produced is based upon the 2017 Cheese Merit $ information from USDA-AGIL. Feed costs are the increased cost of feed per lactation that is eaten by higher producing cows. Maintenance costs are associated with body maintenance based upon the National Research Council plus increased housing costs minus income from heavier calf weights. Body weight is predicted from HAUSA classification data. The formula was developed as a part of the USDA multi-state research project on feed efficiency and a cooperative project with researchers at the University of Wageningen in the Netherlands.

FE = (-.0187 x Milk) + (1.28 x Fat) + (1.95 x Protein) - (12.4 x BWC)

Fertility Index (FI)

The Fertility Index combines several reproductive components into one overall index: ability to conceive as a maiden heifer, ability to conceive as a lactating cow, and a cow's overall ability to start cycling again, show heat, conceive, and maintain a pregnancy. The Fertility Index is derived from the formula:

FI = 18% Heifer Conception Rate (HCR) + 18% Cow Conception Rate (CCR) + 64% Daughter Pregnancy Rate (DPR)